🔗 Share this article

Worldwide, governments are investing massive amounts into the concept of “sovereign AI” – creating domestic AI models. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, countries are vying to build AI that grasps local languages and local customs.

The International AI Battle

This movement is part of a wider international competition dominated by major corporations from the America and China. While firms like OpenAI and a social media giant invest massive capital, mid-sized nations are also taking independent gambles in the AI landscape.

Yet given such vast sums at stake, can smaller nations achieve notable advantages? As noted by a specialist from a well-known policy organization, Except if you’re a rich government or a major firm, it’s a significant burden to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

Security Issues

A lot of states are reluctant to depend on overseas AI systems. Across India, for example, Western-developed AI tools have sometimes proven inadequate. One example involved an AI tool employed to teach learners in a isolated village – it communicated in English with a thick American accent that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional students.

Additionally there’s the defence aspect. For the Indian military authorities, using certain foreign models is viewed unacceptable. As one entrepreneur commented, “It could have some unvetted data source that could claim that, oh, a certain region is outside of India … Utilizing that certain system in a defence setup is a major risk.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to people who are in security. They want to use AI, but, disregarding certain models, they prefer not to rely on US systems because information may be transferred outside the country, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Efforts

In response, a number of nations are funding local projects. An example this project is being developed in India, wherein a company is striving to build a national LLM with public funding. This initiative has allocated roughly a substantial sum to machine learning progress.

The expert foresees a system that is less resource-intensive than premier tools from US and Chinese corporations. He notes that the nation will have to offset the financial disparity with skill. Based in India, we lack the luxury of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we vie with say the hundreds of billions that the US is devoting? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the brain game is essential.”

Native Emphasis

In Singapore, a state-backed program is supporting language models developed in the region's local dialects. Such languages – such as Malay, the Thai language, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often inadequately covered in American and Asian LLMs.

I hope the individuals who are developing these sovereign AI tools were aware of the extent to which and just how fast the cutting edge is progressing.

An executive involved in the program says that these tools are created to enhance bigger models, as opposed to substituting them. Tools such as a popular AI tool and another major AI system, he says, commonly struggle with native tongues and cultural aspects – communicating in unnatural the Khmer language, for example, or recommending meat-containing meals to Malaysian users.

Building native-tongue LLMs allows national authorities to code in cultural sensitivity – and at least be “knowledgeable adopters” of a advanced system created in other countries.

He adds, I am cautious with the concept national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we aim to comprehend the features” of AI systems.

Multinational Collaboration

Regarding countries trying to carve out a role in an growing international arena, there’s an alternative: join forces. Experts affiliated with a well-known policy school recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative distributed among a alliance of emerging nations.

They refer to the initiative “Airbus for AI”, in reference to Europe’s productive strategy to create a rival to Boeing in the 1960s. Their proposal would involve the establishment of a government-supported AI organization that would combine the capabilities of various nations’ AI initiatives – including the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, the Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to establish a competitive rival to the US and Chinese major players.

The main proponent of a study outlining the concept states that the concept has drawn the attention of AI leaders of at least several nations to date, in addition to several state AI firms. Although it is currently focused on “middle powers”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have also shown curiosity.

He explains, Currently, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the promises of the present American government. People are asking like, can I still depend on such systems? What if they choose to